Jos Cenzura si Impostura

Forum dedicat celor insetati de Libertatea de Exprimare, in limitele bunului simt si al respectului mutual.Opinii in orice domeniu: cultural, politic, social, etc.
 
AcasaCalendarFAQCautareMembriGrupuriInregistrareConectare

Distribuiti | 
 

 Romania: justitie sau reglare de conturi? (Cazul Voiculescu si Antena3)

Vezi subiectul anterior Vezi subiectul urmator In jos 
AutorMesaj
Admin
Admin
avatar

Mesaje : 67
Data de inscriere : 26/08/2014
Varsta : 36
Localizare : Romania

MesajSubiect: Romania: justitie sau reglare de conturi? (Cazul Voiculescu si Antena3)   Vin Aug 29, 2014 4:49 am

Articol (in engleza) publicat in ziarul "NewsEurope" de la Bruxelles pe care o citesc toti parlamentarii din C.E.
Titlul s-ar traduce prin: "Romania: justitie sau reglare de conturi?" (in cazul lui Dan Voiculescu si al Antenei 3)..

http://www.neurope.eu/article/romania-justice-or-account-settling

Citat :
Romania: justice or account settling?

by NEOnline 11.08.2014 - 10:40

The main political opponent of Romanian President Traian Basescu, Dan Voiculescu, the founder of Romania's Conservative Party was last week sentenced to ten years  in jail. Part of the same sentence was the seizure of the building of Antena 3, the biggest television channel in Romania.

Officially, Dan Voiculescu was charged for money laundering in the case of an allegedly fraudulent privatization of the Institute for Alimentary Research (ICA), alongside twelve other defendants from different entities involved in the privatization.

On the other hand, Voiculescu’s constant battle with Traian Basescu is of notoriety in Romania, Voiculescu being at the forefront of the President’s two suspension referendums, in 2007 and 2012.

It was the first referendum, triggered by a parliamentary commission led by the then- Senator Dan Voiculescu, the pretext to re-open the privatization file which was ruled out of any penal charges in 2005. Two years later, in 2007, amidst the noise and haste of Traian Basescu’s suspension, an anonymous letter sent to the National Anti Corruption Directorate (DNA) and an article about Dan Voiculescu’s wealth posted in a controversial newspaper led to re-docketing the case.

Dan Voiculescu’s continued exposing disputed facts about the Romanian President's regime while Antena 3, the leading news station in Romania, part of the group founded by Dan Voiculescu, has regularly revealed high-level corruption and abusive acts. A number of such journalistic investigations disclosed severe cases close to the Presidential family: the 1 million euro loan from the State bank of the President’s daughter, in order to purchase a vast piece of land for her father, the Gazprom deals in Romania legalized by the same daughter of the President, as public notary, the penal file which includes the President’s son in law or the tapes which showed a 250.000 euro bribe taken by the President’s brother in exchange for his influence in court. This specific report led to Mircea Basescu’s arrest.

The President’s brother arrest seemed to accelerate Dan Voiculescu’s trial in the Appeal Court. Soon after, the file was assigned to a new panel of judges, promoted on the spot from Bucharest Tribunal, five days before a new court term in the ICA file. Before that, two judges from previous panels were arrested on corruption charges not related to this specific case. The new panel swiftly reached the verdict, in spite of a string of exceptions raised by the lawyers.

All the other 11 defendants in this case envoked their innocence and maintained their statements which revealed that the prosecutors pressured them in the hearings phase in order to connect this case to Voiculescu. Another important aspect pleaded by the lawyers was the fact that all the privatization work in Romania during that period of time was done according to the same law as in the case of ICA.

The defense showed, on the other hand, that the Ministry of Agriculture brought a civil action in the penal proceedings, even though the law in question was abrogated a year before. Even the man who originaly denounced the privatization retracted his statement, saying that Dan Voiculescu’s acquisition of ICA kept the company alive. ICA is the only alimentary research company in Romania to survive the translation to the private sector.

Dan Voiculescu was charged by the prosecutors with money laundering for increasing the registered capital of the company and then transferring his shares to his daughters. The prosecution ignored that Voiculescu was the main shareholder in Grivco (the holding which acquired ICA), therefore he already owned ICA through Grivco. Moreover, it is well known that Voiculescu legally and publicly donated all his fortune to his two daughters, Camelia and Corina, in 2006, when none of his businesses were under any legal investigation.

Dan Voiculescu declared that he does not regret anything in his battle against a vitiated system. He said that the file would not have existed if he had succumbed to the pressure and stopped pursuing his fight against abuses. “It is not easy to be in a conflict with the President, who holds all the necessary levers and has an unrivaled force, but I am fully aware of this. It would have been easy to give up. But I cannot give up honor, dignity and courage. I cannot resign myself to this and I never will” he said

At the same time, another target seems to be the Romanian leading TV channel, Antena 3, afifiliated to CNN.

Antena 3 has revealed a number of liaisons developed by the presidential family which led to the opening of criminal investigations and to the president’s brother preventive arrest.

On July 3rd, the founder of Intact Media Group (which includes Antena 3) was summoned by telephone to present himself in one hour at the National Anti-Corruption Directory. He learned there that he stands accused of alleged blackmail related to advertising contracts for Intact media outlets. The accusers were three business men (one of them under house arrest) who had filed the complaint on the same day of July 3rd.

Dan Voiculescu said to the press that he doesn’t know the accusers nor had he ever communicated with them. He also noted that he is not involved in the media group operations. Nevertheless, he was placed under judiciary control.


Ultima editare efectuata de catre Admin in Vin Aug 29, 2014 2:43 pm, editata de 1 ori
Sus In jos
Vezi profilul utilizatorului http://joscenzura2014.forumgratuit.ro
Admin
Admin
avatar

Mesaje : 67
Data de inscriere : 26/08/2014
Varsta : 36
Localizare : Romania

MesajSubiect: Re: Romania: justitie sau reglare de conturi? (Cazul Voiculescu si Antena3)   Vin Aug 29, 2014 2:30 pm

Ombudsmanul European sesizează Curtea Europeană de Justiție cu privire la hotărârea CAB din dosarul "Telepatia". Bogdan Chirieac: "S-a trecut de linia roșie" - See more at: http://www.dcnews.ro/ombudsmanul-european-sesizeaza-curtea-europeana-de-justi-ie-cu-privire-la-hotararea-cab-din-dosarul-telepatia-bogdan-chirieac-s-a-trecut-de-linia-ro-ie_451901.html#sthash.bNZAG3lW.dpuf

Confiscarea sediului Antena 3 a fost contestată în instanţă >> http://goo.gl/AooVcv

O altfel de părere despre Dan Voiculescu ==>> http://raduherjeu.ro/o-altfel-de-parere-despre-dan-voiculescu/

APTR, alături de Antena 1 şi Antena 3: „Este un gest incalificabil din partea DNA să blocheze vocea unor posturi urmărite de milioane de români”
http://www.antena3.ro/romania/aptr-alaturi-de-antena-1-si-antena-3-este-un-gest-incalificabil-din-partea-dna-sa-blocheze-vocea-263321.html

"Presa este cel mai bun instrument pentru iluminarea minţii omului şi pentru a-l face mai bun ca fiinţă raţională, morală şi socială."
"Când un guvern se teme de cetăţeni, e democraţie. Când cetăţenii se tem de guvern, este dictatură."

[Thomas Jefferson]

Mihai Gadea ȘOCAT de confiscarea sediului Antenei 3 dupa condamnarea lui Dan Voiculescu


Mihai Gadea si Mircea Badea despre cum a decurs procesul lui Dan Voiculescu


MIRCEA BADEA Plimbarea Libertatii ANTENA3 e Aici Protestul de la Cotroceni
Sus In jos
Vezi profilul utilizatorului http://joscenzura2014.forumgratuit.ro
 
Romania: justitie sau reglare de conturi? (Cazul Voiculescu si Antena3)
Vezi subiectul anterior Vezi subiectul urmator Sus 
Pagina 1 din 1

Permisiunile acestui forum:Nu puteti raspunde la subiectele acestui forum
Jos Cenzura si Impostura :: Domeniul JUSTITIEI :: Justitie oarba? sau CHIOARA? "Egala" doar pt unii?-
Mergi direct la: